home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: another.GUN.de!dexam
- From: dexam@another.gun.de (Thomas Fischbacher)
- X-Newsreader: MicroDot 1.10
- Newsgroups: comp.edu,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C or C++ for a 14-year old?
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 12:09:07 +0100
- Message-ID: <w+PJjMD4ED1aLz3@dexam.another.gun.de>
- References: <4b30ld$lp2$1@mhafc.production.compuserve.com> <4d4jeh$fv1@wombat.melbpc.org.au>
- X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UT tron.gun.de [Z-NEWS 2.5p/AMIGA]
-
- On 12.01.1996 [04:09:15] [sbuzz@melbpc.org.au (Scott Buszard)] wrote the following lines about
- "Re: C or C++ for a 14-year old?"SB> G'day!
-
- SB> If I had not had all the other experience, I would not have found it
- SB> as easy to pick up. Personally, I would reccommend C++ DOS based
- SB> first, then move on to OO. It is handy to know many types of langs.
-
- When learning a new language, one shouldn't stick to a crappy system like
- DOS which imposes lots of unneccessary restrictions compared to a real
- OS. I mean Unix (netbsd, linux for single-user systems), os/2 or
- something alike.
- I don't want to say that there are no other good os'es, but DOS etc.
- certainly is the worst there is.
-
-
- --
- regards, Thomas Fischbacher - dexam@another.gun.de
-
- Microsoft Network is prohibited from redistributing this work in any form, in
- whole or in part. License to distribute this post is available to Microsoft
- for $499. Posting without permission constitutes an agreement to these terms.
-
-